See Berger v. New York, 388 U.S. 41, 57 (1967). On January 14, 2020, these rides made him a suspect in a local burglary.22. zS During the protests in response to the murder of George Floyd, for example, companies collected and sold protesters phone data to political groups for election-related use,107107. Redding, 557 U.S. at 370; see also Harris, 568 U.S. at 243; Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 696 (1996); Brown, 460 U.S. at 742 (plurality opinion); Brinegar, 338 U.S. at 17576. 2015); Eunjoo Seo v. State, 148 N.E.3d 952, 959 (Ind. 636(a)(1); Fed. P. 41(d)(1), (e)(2). Google Amicus Brief, supra note 11, at 13. Animal rights activists have captured the first hidden-camera video from inside a carbon dioxide stunning chamber in a US meatpacking plant. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Cond Nast. The size of the area may vary. Id. Clayton Rice, K.C. 2 (Big Hit Ent. See Brief of Amicus Curiae Google LLC in Support of Neither Party Concerning Defendants Motion to Suppress Evidence from a Geofence General Warrant at 1112, United States v. Chatrie, No. . Id. Apple, Uber, and Snapchat have all received similar requests from law enforcement agencies. 84/ S. 296, would prohibit government use of geofence warrants and reverse warrants, a bill that EFF also supports. In listing the things to be seized, a warrant must list all the data that law enforcement intends to collect throughout the entirety of Googles process, which includes, at least, the latitude/longitude coordinates and timestamp of the reported location information of each device identified by Google in step one.173173. See, e.g., Elm, supra note 27, at 11, 13. Thus, a "geofence warrant" provides the government the ability to obtain location data for a Google user for a particular area and, eventually, subscriber information for the account holder using . at *10. these criticisms are insufficient for the purposes of probable cause, which has never required certainty just probability. Zachary McCoy went for a bike ride on a Friday in March 2019. . 20 M 297, 2020 WL 5491763, at *6 (N.D. Ill. July 8, 2020) (rejecting the governments argument that Googles framework curtail[s] or define[s] the agents discretion in a[] meaningful way); see also Arson, 2020 WL 6343084, at *10; Pharma II, No. Thanks, you're awesome! [News] Google reports increase in geofence warrants If as is common practice, see, e.g., Affidavit for Search Warrant, supra note 65, at 23 officials had requested additional location data as part of step two for these 1,494 devices thirty minutes before and after the initial search, this subsequent search would be broader than many geofence warrants judges have struck down as too probing, see, e.g., Pharma II, No. Officials act with probable cause when they have reasonable belief that either an offense is being committed or evidence of a crime is available in the place searched.140140. Angela Lang/CNET. What Is A Geofence Warrant? Bank Robbery Accused Snagged Using Google As . Between 2017 and 2018, Google saw a 1,500% increase in geofence requests. 205, 22731 (2018); Jennifer D. Oliva, Prescription-Drug Policing: The Right to Health Information Privacy Pre- and Post-Carpenter, 69 Duke L.J. Emily Glazer & Patience Haggin, Political Groups Track Protesters Cellphone Data, Wall St. J. The practice of using sweeping geofence warrants has been adopted by state and federal governments in Arizona,1212. Geofence Warrants On The Rise. This list is and will always be a work in progress and new warrants will be added periodically. Geofence warrants: How police can use protesters' phones against them Google Data and Geofence Warrant Process | nlsblog.org The location data typically comes from Google, who collects data from their Android phone . If police are investigating a crimeanything from vandalism to arsonthey instead submit requests that do not identify a single suspect or particular user account. See, e.g., How Google Handles Government Requests for User Information, Google, https://policies.google.com/terms/information-requests [https://perma.cc/HCW3-UKLX]. The bill would also ban keyword searches, a similarly criticized investigative tactic in which Google hands over data based on what someone searched for. .). See, e.g., Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 735 (1983) (plurality opinion). Under the Fourth Amendment, if police can demonstrate probable cause that searching a particular person or place will reveal evidence of a crime, they can obtain a warrant from a court authorizing a limited search for this evidence. Though admittedly an open question, Google has advocated that they are,2828. Instead, it is enough if the description is such that the officer with a search warrant can with reasonable effort and presumably relying on expertise and experience ascertain and identify the place intended.162162. Speaking to WIRED last year, Quart called the tools a fishing expedition that violates people's basic constitutional rights., But regulation can only move so fast. 1, 2021), https://www.statista.com/statistics/232786/forecast-of-andrioid-users-in-the-us [https://perma.cc/4EDN-MRUN]. Geofencing itself simply means drawing a virtual border around a predefined geographical area. This Note presumes that geofence warrants are Fourth Amendment searches. 19-cr-00130 (E.D. Similarly, geofence warrants in Florida leaped from 81 requests in 2018 to more than 800 last year. See, e.g., Pharma I, No. And that's just Google. In contrast, law enforcement in Arson explained why all the areas included in the geofence could potentially reveal evidence of witnesses or coconspirators. Similarly, the Court has explained that the purpose of the particularity requirement is not limited to the prevention of general searches.125125. ; see, e.g., Search Warrant, supra note 5. Geofence warrants are warrants used by police to tech companies for information about devices in specific areas. Tracking Phones, Google Is a Dragnet for the Police . The key to writing Chatrie compliant geofence warrants is a narrow scope and particularized probable cause. Now, Googles transparency report has revealed the scale at which people nationwide may have faced the same violation. Id. Geofence warrants help police find suspects using Google. A ruling See Albert Fox Cahn, This Unsettling Practice Turns Your Phone into a Tracking Device for the Government, Fast Co. (Jan. 17, 2020), https://www.fastcompany.com/90452990/this-unsettling-practice-turns-your-phone-into-a-tracking-device-for-the-government [https://perma.cc/A4NR-ZRVQ]. and potentially without realiz[ing] the technical details or broad scope of the searches theyre authorizing5656. and with geofence warrants, there is often barely a law enforcement rationale. See id. But lawyers for Rhine, a Washington man accused of various federal crimes on January 6, recently filed a motion to suppress the geofence evidence. Across all 50 states, geofence requests to Google increased from 941 in 2018 to 11,033 in 2020 and now make up more than 25 percent of all data requests the company receives from law enforcement. See Rachel Levinson-Waldman, Hiding in Plain Sight: A Fourth Amendment Framework for Analyzing Government Surveillance in Public, 66 Emory L.J. Minnesota law enforcement has already turned to geofence warrants to identify protesters,109109. The company then gathers information about all the devices that Why is this size of area necessary? Check your Apple warranty status. Id. For more applicable recommendations, see Rachel Levinson-Waldman, Brennan Ctr. Id. Torres v. Puerto Rico, 442 U.S. 465, 471 (1979). Geofence warrants seek location data on every person within a specific location over a certain period of time. Location History Records. amend. See United States v. Patrick, 842 F.3d 540, 54245 (7th Cir. Id. After producing a narrowed list of accounts in response to a warrant, companies often engage in a back-and-forth with law enforcement, where officials requestadditional location information about specific devices from before or after the requested timeframe to narrow the list of suspects.8282. Florida,1313. In other words, the characterization of a geofence warrant as a search in the first place likely relies in part on the prevalence of cell phones. For a discussion of the Carpenter Courts treatment of the third party doctrine, see Laura K. Donohue, Functional Equivalence and Residual Rights Post-Carpenter: Framing a Test Consistent with Precedent and Original Meaning, 2018 Sup. In re Leopold to Unseal Certain Elec. 20 M 525, 2020 WL 6343084, at *6 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 29, 2020). Law enforcement gets a warrant from a judge, then serves it to Google or Apple. The online conversations that bring us closer together can help build a world thats more free, fair, and creative. Their support is welcome, especially since weve been calling on companies like Google, which have a lot of resources and a lot of lawyers, to do more to resist these kinds of government requests. L. Rev. Google uses its stored location data to personalize advertisements, estimate traffic times, report on how busy restaurants are, and more. vao].Vm}EA_lML/6~o,L|hYivQO"8E`S >f?o2 tfl%\* P8EQ|kt`bZTH6 sf? The three tech giants have issued a public statement through a trade organization,Reform Government Surveillance,'' that they will support a bill before the New York State legislature. But in a dense city, even a relatively narrow geofence warrant would inevitably capture innocent citizens visiting not only busy public streets and commercial establishments, but also gyms, medical offices, and religious sites, revealing, by easy inference, political and religious associations, sexual orientation, and more.123123. As it pertains to law enforcement, geofencing begins with officers defining an area of interest and a time period. and other states. In subsequent decisions, the Court reinforced the notion that probable cause for a single physical location cannot be widely extended to nearby places. See 28 U.S.C. . In fact, it is more precise than either CSLI or GPS.3434. Harris, 568 U.S. at 244; Pringle, 540 U.S. at 371. Given that particularity is inextricably tied to geographic and temporal scope, law enforcement should not be able to seek additional information about a narrowed pool of individuals without either obtaining an additional warrant or explicitly delineating this second search in the original warrant. EFF Backs California Bill to Protect People Seeking Abortion and Gender-Affirming Care from Dragnet Digital Surveillance, Stalkerware Maker Fined $410k and Compelled to Notify Victims, Civil Society Organizations Call on theHouse Of Lords to ProtectPrivate Messaging in the Online Safety Bill, Brazil's Telecom Operators Made Strides and Had Shortcomings in Internet Lab's New Report on User Privacy Practices, EFF and Partners Call Out Threats to Free Expression in Draft Text as UN Cybersecurity Treaty Negotiations Resume, Global Cybercrime and Government Access to User Data Across Borders: 2022 in Review, Users Worldwide Said "Stop Scanning Us": 2022 in Review. To allow officials to request this information without specifying it would grant them unbridled discretion to obtain data about particular users under the guise of seeking location data.175175. at *3. and cameras in the area that law enforcement already had access to captured no pedestrians and only three cars.169169. 20 M 392, 2020 WL 4931052, at *10 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 24, 2020) (quoting the governments search warrant applications). These reverse warrants have serious implications for civil liberties. These searches, which occur [w]ith just the click of a button and at practically no expense,102102. How to Encrypt any File, Folder, or Drive on Your System, The Hunt for the Dark Webs Biggest Kingpin, Part 1: The Shadow. In keeping with Google's established approach, the Geofence Warrant described a three-step process by which law . Now Its Paused, The Biggest US Surveillance Program You Didnt Know About. Their support is welcome, especially since. While Apple, Facebook and other tech companies have geofencing capabilities, Google is often used for . Id. Jam Buka: Senin - Sabtu (10.00-18.00), Minggu (Tutup) No.Telp/HP: (021) 1500372. Meg OConnor, Avondale Man Sues After Google Data Leads to Wrongful Arrest for Murder, Phx. One such feature is Apple's proposed child sexual abuse material detection (CSAM . "Geofence Warrants Are the Future (and That's a Good Thing)" Stanford v. Texas, 379 U.S. 476, 481 (1965). In Wilkes v. Wood,9292. Smith, The Carpenter Chronicle: A Near-Perfect Surveillance, 132 Harv. Apple will only provide content in response to a search warrant issued upon a showing of probable cause, or customer consent. The government must thus establish probable cause for the time146146. . The geofence warrants served on Google shortly after the riot remained sealed. Just., Summer 2020, at 7. Critics noted that such a bill could penalize anyone attending peaceful demonstrations that, because of someone elses actions, become violent. Pharma II, 2020 WL 4931052, at *16; see also Groh, 540 U.S. at 557. Carpenter, 138 S. Ct. at 2218. Each one of these orders could sweep in hundreds or . United States v. Jacobsen, 466 U.S. 109, 113 (1984). Rep. 489 (KB). Raleigh Police Searched Google Accounts as Part of Downtown Fire Probe, WRAL.com (July 13, 2018, 2:07 PM), https://www.wral.com/scene-of-a-crime-raleigh-police-search-google-accounts-as-part-of-downtown-fire-probe/17340984 [https://perma.cc/8KDX-TCU5] (explaining that Google could not disclose its search for ninety days); Tony Webster, How Did the Police Know You Were Near a Crime Scene? Apple Inc. - Check Your Service and Support Coverage Google Told Them, MPRnews (Feb. 7, 2019, 9:10 PM), https://www.mprnews.org/story/2019/02/07/google-location-police-search-warrants [https://perma.cc/Q2ML-RBHK] (describing a six-month nondisclosure order). As a result, to better protect users data and to ensure uniformity of process, Google purports to always push back on overly broad requests6767. See Berger v. New York, 388 U.S. 41, 5153 (1967). Cf. A single geofence request could include data from hundreds of bystanders. 2020); State v. Tate, 849 N.W.2d 798, 813 (Wis. 2014) (Abrahamson, C.J., dissenting). merely by asking private companies. 20 M 297, 2020 WL 5491763, at *6 (N.D. Ill. July 8, 2020). See Maryland v. Garrison, 480 U.S. 79, 85 (1987). 775, 84245 (2020). In practice, inquiry into probable cause for time will likely overlap with the preliminary question of whether geofence warrants are searches. The Supreme Court has rejected efforts to expand the scope of this provision to embrace unenumerated matters. United States v. Grubbs, 547 U.S. 90, 97 (2006). . That is because Apple doesn't store location data in a format . Third and finally, the nature of the crime of arson in comparison to the theft and resale of pharmaceuticals was more susceptible to notice from passerby witnesses.157157. Part II begins with the threshold question of when a geofence search occurs and argues that it is when private companies parse through their entire location history databases to find accounts that fit within a warrants parameters. Location data is inextricably tied to the freedoms of speech and association. Second, law enforcement reviews the anonymized list and identifies devices it is interested in.7171. See Arson, 2020 WL 6343084, at *8. P. 41(e)(2). Ct., 387 U.S. 523, 528 (1967). But a warrant does not need to describe the exact item being seized,160160. It is unclear whether the data collected is stored indefinitely, see Webster, supra note 5 (suggesting that it is), but there are strong constitutional arguments that it should not be, see United States v. Ganias, 824 F.3d 199, 21518 (2d Cir. U.S. v. Rhine, a decision issued two weeks ago by the federal district court for the District of Columbia, denying a January 6 . Two warrants included just a commercial lot and high school event space, which was highly unlikely to be occupied.167167. What Are Geofence Warrants? How They Be Used Against Protesters This Part argues that the relevant search for Fourth Amendment purposes occurs instead when a private company first searches through its entire database step one in Googles framework and that, as a result, geofence warrants are categorically unconstitutional. On the iPhone it's called "Location Services". George Joseph & WNYC Staff, Manhattan DA Got Innocent Peoples Google Phone Data Through a Reverse Location Search Warrant, Gothamist (Aug. 13, 2019, 5:38 PM), https://gothamist.com/news/manhattan-da-got-innocent-peoples-google-phone-data-through-a-reverse-location-search-warrant [https://perma.cc/RH9K-4BJZ]. Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 467 (1971); see also Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 373, 403 (2014). Id. See Gates, 462 U.S. at 238. Google now gets geofence warrants from agencies in all 50 states, Washington, D.C., and the . When probable cause to search a garage does not even extend to a bedroom in the same house,147147. Stability Oversight Council, 865 F.3d 661, 668 (D.C. Cir. 20 M 392, 2020 WL 4931052, at *1 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 24, 2020); Pharma I, No. What are Geofence Warrants? - Polk Law PLLC The fact that geofence warrants capture the data of innocent people is not, by itself, a problem for Fourth Amendment purposes since many technologies such as security cameras do the same. Geofence warrants represent both a continuation and an evolution of this relationship. 2017). Cops have discovered Google houses plenty of location data. and their decisions informed and deliberate.5252. 20 M 392, 2020 WL 4931052, at *13 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 24, 2020). Recently, users filed a class action against Google on these grounds. March 15, 2022. Texas,1818. While some explain this practice by pointing to the Stored Communications Act,5959. The existence of probable cause, for example, must be tied not only to whether the database contains evidence of the crime but also to whether probable cause extends to the areas for which location data is requested. . The geofence is . Another covered solely a small L-shaped roadway,168168. The time and place of the crime are necessarily known by law enforcement, giving rise to probable cause to search the relevant area. First Circuit Divides on Constitutionality of Warrantless Pole-Camera Surveillance of Home's Curtilage. This Note begins to fill the gap, focusing specifically on the Fourth Amendments warrant requirements: probable cause and particularity. First, the narrowness of the anonymized list is largely in the hands of private companies, rather than the judiciary or legislature, which is impracticable in the long run. Typically, a geofence warrant calls on Google to access its database of location information. This rummaging and the general [a]wareness that the government may be watching chills associational and expressive freedoms.106106. Probable cause ensures that no intrusion at all is justified without a careful prior determination of necessity130130. Federal public defender Donna Lee Elm has proposed the enactment of a geofence-specific statute that parallels the Federal Wiretap Act, 18 U.S.C. The warrant was thus sufficiently particular. See, e.g., Affidavit for Search Warrant, supra note 65, at 23. the Supreme Court emphasized that the traditional rule that an officer [can] not search unauthorized areas extends to electronic surveillance.8585. In the past, the greatest protections of privacy were neither constitutional nor statutory, but practical.176176. Just this week, Kenosha lawmakers debated a bill that would make attending a riot a felony. When law enforcement seeks CSLI associated with a particular device, it merely asks for information that phone companies already collect, compile, and store.7878. serves as a useful example, especially when juxtaposed with In re Search of: Information Stored at Premises Controlled by Google, as Further Described in Attachment A (Pharma I).151151. On the Android, it's simply called "Location". What is a geofence warrant? | Kopp Law - FindLaw IM Template . Because it is rare to search an individual in the modern age. . Explore the stories of slave revolts, the coded songs of Harriet Tubman, civil rights era strategies for circumventing "Ma Bell," and the use of modern day technology to document police abuse. In Wong Sun v. United States,115115. In 2019, a single warrant in connection with an arson resulted in nearly 1,500 device identifiers being sent to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives. The Mystery Vehicle at the Heart of Teslas New Master Plan, All the Settings You Should Change on Your New Samsung Phone, This Hacker Tool Can Pinpoint a DJI Drone Operator's Location, Amazons HQ2 Aimed to Show Tech Can Boost Cities. 20 M 297, 2020 WL 5491763, at *3 (N.D. Ill. July 8, 2020) (noting that particularity is inversely related to the quality and breadth of probable cause). Second, this list is often quite broad. Johnson, 333 U.S. at 14; see also McDonald v. United States, 335 U.S. 451, 456 (1948) (Power is a heady thing; and history shows that the police acting on their own cannot be trusted.); Lefkowitz, 285 U.S. at 464 (preferring not to rel[y] upon the caution and sagacity of petty officers while acting under the excitement that attends the capture of persons accused of crime). 13, 2019), https://nyti.ms/2DnN7KT [https://perma.cc/P5N3-4HSD]. See Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 467 (1971) (explaining that particularity guarantees that intrusions are as limited as possible). Execs. Assn, 489 U.S. 602, 614 (1989). What kind of information do officers receive? at 1128 (quoting EEOC v. Natl Child.s Ctr., Inc., 98 F.3d 1406, 1409 (D.C. Cir. With permission from a judge, they allow law enforcement to obtain anonymized data from Google from almost any device that was in a certain geographic . See United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400, 430 (2012) (Alito, J., concurring); see also State v. Brown, 202 A.3d 1003, 1012 n.8 (Conn. 2019); Commonwealth v. Estabrook, 38 N.E.3d 231, 237 (Mass. "We vigorously protect the privacy of our users while supporting the important work of law enforcement, Google said in a statement to WIRED. Geofence warrants are sometimes referred to as reverse location warrants. The trick is knowing which thing to disable. After spending several thousand dollars retaining a lawyer, McCoy successfully blocked the release.44. Few are as fortunate as McCoy, who at least was informed and had the opportunity to block the request in court. 7, 2020, 6:22 AM), https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/google-tracked-his-bike-ride-past-burglarized-home-made-him-n1151761 [https://perma.cc/73TP-KBXR]. See Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 700 (1996); Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 480 (1963); Erica Goldberg, Getting Beyond Intuition in the Probable Cause Inquiry, 17 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. Geofence warrants, in contrast, allow law enforcement to access private companies deep repository of historical location information,101101. But months later, in January of this year, McCoy got an email from Google saying that his data was going to be released to local police. This Is How It Works., N.Y. Times (Apr. It should be a last resort, because its so invasive.. The difference between a tower dump and step one of Googles framework is obvious: the tower dump involves only data tied to the cell towers location, while Google searches all of its location data even though none of it may be within the parameters of a geofence warrant. The password managers most recent data breach is so concerning, users need to take immediate steps to protect themselves. Ng, supra note 9. Geofence warrants: What they are and why they're controversial IV. No. Minnesota,1515. Geofence Warrants and the Fourth Amendment - Harvard Law Review If this is the case, whether the warrant is sufficiently particular and whether probable cause exists should be evaluated not with respect to the database generally, but in relation to the time period and geographic area that is actually searched. This Part explains why the Fourth Amendments warrant requirements should be tied to the scope of the search at step two, then explains what this might mean for probable cause and particularity.